Thomas Paine Essay on the Rights of Man

Thomas Paine Essay on the Rights of ManThomas Paine presents his own version of the Rights of Man, where he states, 'We are speaking as a generalization.' He also goes on to say, 'A fundamental truth of the fact is the fact that nations, men, and mankind have always spoken words of anger.His interpretation of these words is simply, 'The United States of America has always been strong.' So, what does this have to do with the rights of man? It actually means that nations and people always try to 'succeed' at anything they do, including looking for a way to make a better country.It is a thought provoking essay, and a very interesting point to look at because it is meant to be an individual's thoughts and ideas on a subject. And, although I am sure that this is not the first time he has written about this, it is definitely one of the most interesting essays that he has ever written. In this article I will not only look at what Thomas Paine had to say but also how to apply his comments in your own writing.Perhaps you will not agree with the basic premise that you state when you write about your opinions on the United States of America, but I do believe that when it comes to things such as the rights of man and the American way of life, people should be able to express their thoughts without being held back by censorship. Indeed, the world is a complex place, and no single country or government can provide answers for everyone, but we should all learn to respect one another, regardless of how we might see ourselves.Throughout the essay Topics, Thomas Paine actually uses the Constitution as an example of a good government, saying, 'In the United States, the Constitution has been given a better word. A very real faith is given to that great body of principles which was revealed to us from time to time by the bill of rights, and has enabled us to enjoy the blessings of liberty.'You can relate the Rights of Man essay to one of the earlier writings that he had written, su ch as the Rights of Man before the Revolution, in which he explained why he believed in limited government and a strong union. Interestingly enough, he actually states that the Union is similar to the Union of nature, whereby both groups of animals 'grew out of the same stock, had the same origin, and were guided by the same laws.'The answer that he gave was that in the United States there were fewer differences among the parts of the particular species known as a 'man' than there would be in 'nature.' He believed that the union of 'two millions of free citizens under a common government' was a perfect example of what was to occur between countries.Indeed, he believed that these individual rights would allow people to prosper and to be free. Indeed, I hope you found this article as interesting as I did.